FAME for Inland Shipping: Reducing CO2 Without Modifying the Engine
Author: Jeroen Berger • Publication date:
Inland shipping is facing an accelerated sustainability challenge. Under the European Climate Law (Regulation (EU) 2021/1119) and the revised Renewable Energy Directive (RED III), EU Member States are required to ensure that by 2030, at least 14.5 percent of total energy use in transport comes from renewable sources. This target is legally binding but allows national discretion in allocating the share across different sectors. While RED III does not specify a fixed share for inland shipping, the sector can contribute through national policies or subsidy schemes. If so, inland shipping must significantly reduce CO2 emissions across the entire fuel chain (well-to-wheel), depending on the selected technology and fuel type.
For existing inland vessels, this is no easy task. Although switching to hydrogen, electric propulsion or synthetic e-fuels sounds promising, it often requires major technical modifications. These include engine replacements, fuel storage adjustments or additional safety measures. Such interventions are costly and frequently lead to prolonged downtime. For the majority of the current fleet, a full retrofit by 2030 is therefore unfeasible.
Against this backdrop, FAME (Fatty Acid Methyl Ester) offers an immediately deployable interim solution for the existing inland shipping fleet in Europe. This biodiesel variant is compatible with conventional diesel engines and can be bunkered as blends up to B20 through existing infrastructure. Provided the engine manufacturer grants approval, technical modifications are usually unnecessary. As a result, shipping companies and shipowners can reduce their CO2 emissions relatively easily, without compromising vessel availability. Within the current transition framework, FAME is regarded as a practical step toward sustainability, pending structural fleet renewal beyond 2035.
This article explores FAME’s potential role in decarbonizing inland shipping. We examine the origin and properties of this biofuel, its environmental performance, operational suitability and practical considerations. We also address the policy framework for large-scale adoption toward 2030 and 2050, and compare FAME to alternatives such as HVO, bio-LNG and GTL.
What FAME Is and How It Is Produced
FAME, or Fatty Acid Methyl Ester, is a type of biodiesel produced from vegetable oils or animal fats. During production, these fats undergo a chemical process known as transesterification, in which the fat molecules react with methanol to form methyl esters, a liquid closely resembling diesel in appearance but with a different molecular structure.
A key distinction is that FAME contains oxygen atoms in its fuel molecules. This makes the fuel biodegradable and results in lower emissions of soot, unburned hydrocarbons (HC), carbon monoxide (CO) and particulate matter (PM) during combustion. However, the presence of oxygen also increases susceptibility to aging, water absorption and microbial growth. Storage and use therefore require extra care, especially at low temperatures or during prolonged vessel lay-up.
FAME’s environmental performance strongly depends on the feedstocks used. Under the revised Renewable Energy Directive (RED III), preference is given to waste streams such as used cooking oil (UCO) or non-edible animal fats from category 1 or 2. These sources do not compete with food production and have a relatively low CO2 footprint across the fuel chain. When produced from such inputs, FAME can reduce total CO2 emissions by 80 to 90 percent compared to fossil diesel. However, this reduction must be substantiated through recognized certification schemes such as ISCC (International Sustainability and Carbon Certification) or RSB (Roundtable on Sustainable Biomaterials), in accordance with RED III and ISO 14040.
Technical Differences Between FAME and HVO
HVO, or Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil, is also a liquid biofuel but produced through a completely different process. Whereas FAME results from the esterification of fatty acids with methanol, HVO is made by treating oils or fats with hydrogen. This process, called hydrotreatment, removes all oxygen atoms from the molecules, producing a paraffinic fuel that is chemically almost identical to fossil diesel.
Due to its molecular structure, HVO is fully compatible with standard diesel engines. It meets the European EN 15940 standard for paraffinic diesel and can be used without technical modifications. Because HVO contains no oxygen, it is far less prone to aging, water absorption or microbial contamination. Whereas FAME can cause sludge formation or blockages during long-term storage under humid conditions, HVO typically remains trouble-free. This chemical stability enhances reliability and reduces maintenance requirements.
Performance differences are also clear. HVO has nearly the same energy density as fossil diesel and a high cetane number of around 80, enabling rapid ignition and efficient combustion. FAME has about thirteen percent less energy per liter, which may result in slightly higher fuel consumption in practice.
Emission measurements show that pure FAME (B100) can emit up to ten percent more nitrogen oxides (NOx) than fossil diesel in some engines. This depends on engine type, calibration and operating conditions. HVO generally performs better in this regard: NOx emissions typically remain the same or decline slightly, especially when combined with modern exhaust after-treatment systems such as SCR catalysts.
Bio-LNG, GTL and Fossil LNG as Alternatives to FAME
A frequently cited alternative to liquid biofuels in inland shipping is bio-LNG. This fuel consists of liquefied biomethane, typically produced by digesting organic waste such as manure, sewage sludge or food and garden waste. When managed through a well-organized supply chain, bio-LNG can be nearly climate neutral across the entire fuel life cycle. However, its application requires specific engine types, such as LNG Otto engines or dual-fuel systems, along with cryogenic storage tanks. For existing inland vessels, this often entails extensive and costly modifications, making large-scale use difficult in the short term.
Fossil LNG, or liquefied natural gas, has a lower theoretical CO2 output per energy unit than conventional diesel. In practice, however, its actual climate benefit is limited once methane slip is included. This refers to unburned methane emissions during bunkering, exhaust or tank venting. As a result, total greenhouse gas reduction is generally limited to five to ten percent. Still, fossil LNG offers clear benefits for local air quality, as the fuel contains virtually no sulfur or particulate matter. Depending on engine type and load, NOx emissions may be up to eighty percent lower than those from conventional diesel engines.
A third alternative is GTL, or Gas-to-Liquid. This synthetic diesel is produced from natural gas through the Fischer-Tropsch process, which converts gaseous hydrocarbons into liquid fuel components. GTL is paraffinic, completely sulfur-free and suitable for use in standard diesel engines without technical modifications. Combustion is clean, with reduced soot formation and sometimes slightly lower NOx emissions. However, as GTL is derived from fossil sources, it does not contribute to long-term CO2 reduction. It does not meet the RED III definition of sustainable fuels and has limited policy relevance within climate or blending obligations.
Environmental Impact and Practical Considerations in Using FAME
FAME can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, particularly when produced from high-quality waste streams such as used cooking oil or non-edible animal fat from categories 1 or 2. When the production process is efficient and sustainability is certified under schemes such as ISCC or RSB, the fuel meets the stringent requirements of RED III and ISO 14040. This aligns with life cycle analysis methods and delivers a meaningful CO2 reduction compared to fossil diesel.
However, using FAME onboard requires attention to operational details and fuel management. Due to its cleaning properties, initial use can loosen deposits in tanks and fuel lines, which may clog filters and disrupt the fuel system. Many shipping companies therefore carry out preventive tank cleaning or stock extra filters when switching to blends above B20.
FAME is also more susceptible to microbial contamination, as it absorbs water more easily than fossil diesel. In humid environments, bacteria and fungi can develop rapidly, forming a biofilm at the fuel-water interface that can block fuel systems and damage injectors. Preventive measures are essential. Regularly draining water from the tank bottom, using effective water separators and adding biocides when needed can help mitigate these risks.
Cold weather resistance is another consideration. FAME made from saturated fats often has a relatively high Cold Filter Plugging Point (CFPP). At low temperatures, crystals may form that impede flow. To prevent winter malfunctions, it is advisable to use only blends with certified low CFPP values. Heated day tanks and heat tracing on fuel lines can also help.
Infrastructure, Market Acceptance and Policy Frameworks for FAME
A major advantage of FAME is its compatibility with the existing inland shipping bunkering infrastructure. Storage tanks, pipelines and shore-based pumps require no modifications. Blends up to B30 can be handled through standard diesel distribution networks without technical changes. This sets FAME apart from alternative fuels such as LNG or methanol, which require specialized or cryogenic bunkering systems.
Fuel suppliers such as FincoEnergies and Oliehandel Terlouw offer standard blends such as B15 and B30 via conventional bunkering stations. These blends are prepared just prior to delivery and stored under controlled conditions to ensure fuel stability and quality, in accordance with EN 14214.
Practical experience with FAME in inland shipping is growing rapidly. In 2024, companies including VT Group and Dekker Groep conducted long-term demonstration voyages using B30 under normal operating conditions. Results confirmed that high-quality FAME blends, when applied properly, do not cause structural technical issues. Still, it remains crucial for shipping companies and shipowners to observe basic precautions such as maintaining tank hygiene and replacing fuel filters on time. Structural onboard modifications are generally unnecessary.
From a policy perspective, FAME aligns well with European climate targets. The fuel meets the sustainability criteria of the revised Renewable Energy Directive (RED III) and can count toward national renewable transport energy quotas. Certified FAME, for instance with an ISCC or RSB label, qualifies for CO2 reporting by shippers and clients. It is also eligible under existing assessment frameworks such as the Green Award and the CO2 Performance Ladder.
To further promote FAME, additional policy measures and fiscal incentives may prove effective. These include excise duty reductions, CO2 compensation schemes or performance-based rewards for demonstrable emission reductions. Such tools lower the threshold for market acceptance without burdening shipowners with significant investment costs.
FAME as a Transitional Fuel Toward 2030 and 2050
In the short term, FAME offers a practical pathway to reduce CO2 emissions in inland shipping. Since the fuel can be used in existing diesel engines and bunkered via current infrastructure without technical adjustments, FAME provides an accessible option for shipowners aiming to comply with the binding reduction obligations under the revised Renewable Energy Directive and Regulation (EU) 2023/2417. This allows significant emission reductions without immediate investment in new vessels or engine configurations.
Over the medium and long term, however, FAME faces clear limitations. The availability of suitable feedstocks, such as used vegetable oils and non-edible animal fats, is limited. As other sectors, including road transport and aviation, increasingly rely on these waste streams, pressure on feedstock markets will intensify. Furthermore, FAME remains a combustion-based fuel. Despite its biogenic nature, combustion always results in CO2 emissions, even when considered circular in a life cycle analysis. In light of Europe’s ambition to eventually transition to zero-emission shipping, FAME is not a permanent solution. Its use is expected to decline gradually after 2035 in favor of zero-emission alternatives such as e-methanol, hydrogen or ammonia.
Nonetheless, FAME will remain a key link in the inland shipping energy transition over the coming years. It enables substantial CO2 reductions before 2030, thereby creating policy space for the gradual implementation of long-term solutions. As long as fuel quality is ensured and application is managed carefully, FAME remains a strategically valuable tool. It helps shipowners reduce their ecological footprint, supports policymakers in meeting EU climate targets and allows fuel suppliers to gain experience in sustainable distribution within existing logistics chains.